Fred Zaspel's
HOME         LIBRARY         SERMONS         WARFIELD         REVIEWS         HYMNS         POSTS         ABOUT FGZ           
All content authored by Fred Zaspel > Copyright Fred Zaspel 
                                                      Repentance and Original Sin
                                                                  Fred G. Zaspel

In an 1899 article for Union Seminary Magazine, Warfield takes up the question, must we repent
of original sin? He notes that the question is often asked triumphantly by those who oppose the doctrine,
assuming that the question itself demonstrates the absurdity of the doctrine-the only sin we are conscious
of is our own transgressions, and these alone demand repentance. But the question is sometimes asked
also by earnest Christians seeking to perform their whole duty to the Lord. If all sin must be repented of,
then in order to obtain forgiveness must I not repent of the sin inherited from Adam? And if not, am I not
being frivolous with my sin?

Warfield advises that the answer must begin with a careful understanding of the terms
“repentance” and “original sin.” If repentance simply means sorrow, we will answer the question in quite a
different way than if repentance means amendment of life. Similarly, if by “original sin” we mean Adam’s
personal sin made ours by an external act of imputation, our conclusion will be quite different than if by it
we mean our own inborn depravity. And so Warfield counsels that we define the terms in their broadest
possible way. Repentance must mean “not merely sorrow for and hatred of sin, but also the inward
turning away from it to God, with full purpose of new obedience.” And by “original sin” we must indicate
“not merely adherent but also inherent sin, not merely the sinful act of Adam imputed to us, but also the
sinful state of our own souls conveyed to us by the just judgment of God.”

With this understanding of these terms in mind it seems clear that we must indeed “repent of
original sin.” To be sure, we cannot repent of that first sinful act of Adam, but in fact our sympathies are
with him. What we call original sin, “the corruption that is derived by us from our first parents,” not only
comes to us as a penalty but also “abides in us as sin.” And surely, not only God but our enlightened
conscience also must view this as sin and as abhorrent. God cannot look on it but with righteous
indignation. The Arminians are wrong to speak of original sin merely in terms of “uncondemnable
vitiosity,” for “whatever is vicious is by that very token condemnable.” In proportion, then, that our
conscience is quickened and enlightened by the Holy Spirit and his Word, we will estimate our sinfulness
as God estimates it and abhor and condemn it for the abhorrent corruption that it is.

This [according to Warfield] is precisely the self-arraignment we witness of Paul in Romans 7.
Enlivened by the Spirit of God, he is in deep contrition not only for what he has done but for what he is.
For such a man, “the very core of his repentance will be his firm determination not only to do better but to
be better.” And so Warfield concludes that, “so far from its being impossible to repent of original sin,
repentance, considered in its normative sense-not as an act of turning away from this sin or that sin, but
of turning from sin as such to God-is fundamentally just repentance of ‘original sin.’” Warfield adds, “Until
we repent of original sin, we have not, properly speaking, repented in the Christian sense at all.” It is
essentially heathen to view sin atomistically, in terms only of specific transgressions. The Christian view
“probes deeper” until he “finds behind the acts of sin the sinful nature.” Indeed, we have not truly repented
until we have recognized “and felt the filthiness and odiousness” of our depraved nature and turned away
from it “to God with a full purpose of being hereafter more conformed to his image as revealed in the face
of Jesus Christ,” who alone never needed repentance

(From Fred G. Zaspel, The Theology of B.B. Warfield [Crossway, 2010], p.407-4-8)